Does the memory on pages of high traffic affect the mention of AI?

Does being seen on the Internet lead to more references in AI assistants? I define “visibility” or visibility on the web as an estimated total monthly search movement on all pages that mention the individual.

These are observable websites on the Internet, with great visibility. Presenting your brand on these pages means that you probably have more credibility, that you are a well -known brand.

I looked at the 50 best sites listed at the Brand Ahrefs radar for Google AI, Chatgpt and embarrassment reviews. This is an AI ~ 76.7 m review, horses of ChatgPT by 957 thousand. And 953.5k hints of embarrassment for the month of 2025.

Let’s start.

I will give the usual correlation not equal to the waiver of causal fitness.

I didn’t think that would be any direct signal, but I expected quite mighty correlations here. Google AI review shows a moderate, almost mighty correlation. Embarrassment is a destitute correlation, but similar to moderate. Chatgpt shows a destitute correlation.

As we saw in other studies, Google favors brands. Embarrassment always seems to be more balanced. I think Chatgpt is strongly based on partnerships for the best sources of citation.

Here Spearman rank correlations For the visibility of the vs. AI visibility in the 50 best domains in each system:

Final thoughts

It will be intriguing how it changes when we run it for a larger number of websites.

Remember to check the brand’s radar. The brand’s radar is not only another LLM visibility monitor, we follow a immense number of queries in all these systems and you can ask for every product, service or brand and compare competitors. It’s more like a site explorer than to track ranks.

In addition, we have a network visibility indicator so that you can see how you talk about the Internet and the search requirements indexes to see how popular you are in searching.