The recent study sheds lithe on the emotional toll for rescue volunteers

The recent study sheds lithe on the emotional toll for rescue volunteers

In Australia they are About 235,000 rescue volunteers who aid communities react and regenerate after the defeat of natural and other traumatic events.

These include volunteers from Metropolitan and Rural Fire Services and other rescue organizations.

Because natural disasters are becoming more and more earnest with climate change We rely on these volunteers more than ever. However, the number of volunteers shrink.

Our new research It reveals an essential, but often hidden toll from natural disasters – the mental health of volunteers in the emergency service who risk physical and emotional burnout.

In our study we interviewed 32 Victorian State Service Service (SES) and village volunteers of the fire brigade (CFA). They told us that they often do not receive adequate support.

Exposure to death

Death is something widely hidden behind clinical curtains. But in the case of volunteers of emergency services, exposure to death and death is only part of the work. The death of work arrives unpredictably – on the roads, in burned houses, on storms, floods and suicide.

Considering that their work is often done in the local community, victims are often known to a volunteer, which can further complicate regret. As one participant told us:

You will definitely meet someone you know or at some point someone you love […] in a bad situation.

Another told his colleague’s experience:

It wasn’t until the next day she learned that she really knew a deceased person, but she did not recognize her.

Volunteers often described on stage to aid, but not fully prepared for what they find. They told experience, including the recovery of children who drowned, observe people dying on the side of the road and stating that burned and mutilated human remains.

These meetings evoke intense emotional reactions, from shock and sadness to a sense of powerlessness and sensitivity. For many, a sense of helplessness and regret resound in everyday life. As one volunteer told us:

I was in a semi -emergency place […] having flashbacks […] Fighting to maintain emotions and perform everyday work.

No formal support

We identified excessive rely on the informal support of the team and individual immunity to deal with hard emotions.

Organized summaries depended on the team’s leadership and dynamics. Leaders from “Tough It Out” think that they unintentionally strengthened the stigma around the search for aid. One participant explained:

People usually just sit there and don’t talk about how they feel […] They are ashamed or embarrassed.

It seems that the way of thinking of some teams is that those who cannot manage work requirements should leave. One volunteer said:

It is mostly very hard and hard. But if you intend to survive in the game, you must be hard.

There are support programs, but they often focus on the main disasters than on more daily work. The command depends on leaders meaning people perceived as threatened or individual volunteers ask for support. One participant explained:

We do a summary with peer support, but some people attach a bold face […] There must be more continuation.

What’s more, support is sometimes hard to obtain. One participant, the team leader, explained what happened when the volunteer in their team did not manage:

I called it mechanisms [we] It was said that we must access. I have someone here who is suicidal, nobody intensified it. I still haven’t heard six hours later.

Importantly, our findings have also emphasized that the one -size approach is not working. For some, peer support is a life line in the scope of processing experience and building immunity, but not for others.

Five women killed. And peer support was over us. You know, we got to the stage where it was witty. We have enough, we don’t want it. Re -traumatizes people who want to go further.

Support for volunteers in the emergency service is not universal.
Minced photo/shutter

Protection of those who protect us

Interview with volunteers of emergency services only from two organizations in one jurisdiction may limit the scope in which we can generalize our arrangements for other regions, countries or culture.

However, Victoria has The second largest number Volunteers in the emergency service in Australia (for the recent southern Wales).

Volunteers of the emergency service are extremely proud and passionate about serving their community and show themselves with care, peace and strength. But our findings show that it has a personal cost, especially without appropriate support.

Volunteers exposing to death and dying must be considered a earnest problem of health and professional safety, not just the emotional side effect of work. We need a proactive, not reactive reform, if we want to recruit, stop and protect people on which we count in crisis.

Legislators and organizations should cooperate with volunteers of emergency services to develop and implement responsive and consistent support services, culture and leadership.

Without targeted, systemic and consistent support, we risk the future of our crisis reaction based on community. Time to protect those who protect us.


If this article has raised problems for you or you are worried about someone you know, call Lifeline to number 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue to 1300 22 4636.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *