Blog
86% of the best -mentioned sources are not available in CHATGPT reviews, embarrassment and artificial intelligence
Jun
Good content is good content, and the best websites are the best websites. These things do not change. However, prejudices in training data and partnerships can change which sources are listed by various AI assistants.
AI assistants may also work slightly differently. By default, they have no idea of websites and can create sources. Looking at you chatgpt.
Some systems are extended to search, where they first recover documents and less often hallucinate results. Some attitude towards partners that they paid for the data license.
Looking at the 50 most frequently mentioned websites at Radar Brand Ahrefs for AI, ChatgPT and embarrassment reviews, only 7 websites have 50 best results for everyone.
This is an AI ~ 76.7 m review, horses of ChatgPT by 957 thousand. And 953.5k hints of embarrassment for the month of 2025.
Sidenote.
The brand radar is not only another LLM visibility monitor, we follow a gigantic number of queries in all these systems and you can ask for every product, service or brand and compare competitors. It’s more like a site explorer than to track ranks.
Here’s what the brand’s radar looks like.
Here is the overlap:
Here’s what is contained in each:
Systems work in slightly different ways. For example:
| Platform | How he chooses quotes |
|---|---|
| Embarrassment | Network search in real time → rank → quotes → quotes best matching source |
| Chatgpt (with browsing) | Search → filters for trusted/licensed domains → CITES |
| Chatgpt (default) | No citations, unless it is pre -built → maybe hallucination |
| Google AI review | From the search index → conditioned list of citations |
| Bing Copilot | Uses the search bing → assignments fragments → includes citat |
Different prejudices and different methodologies mean that even in the case of the same queries, these systems can quote completely different websites.
Based on the types of sites blocking AI bots, additional prejudices will be introduced and those that render javascript, such as Google, compared to those that are not, which is most of them.
Google AI reviews in the direction of the same best sites to which we are used to search results. The emphasis is on authoritative websites for health, finance, encyclopedic knowledge, social media, as well as prejudices for real estate belonging to Google. In particular, media sites, entertainment sites that are not gigiws and e-commerce sites are lost.
Chatgpt is more based on publishers and media other than goals, especially in the case of messages, entertainment and sport. They have license offers and partnerships with many cited websites. Chatgpt has little in terms of health or medicine.
Embarrassment is pulled out of a wider international corps. There are many local and regional brands that were not in the top 50 for other AI assistants. Embarrassment does not have social websites or customary Western media.
