Blog
10 most of the most frequently listed domains for chatgpt, embarrassment and AI reviews in 78.6m search
Jun
I wanted to know which pages are most often mentioned in AI assistants. This should indicate which pages are favored by various systems.
I looked at the 10 best pages quoted at Radar Brand Ahrefs for Google AI, ChatgPT and embarrassment reviews.
This is an AI ~ 76.7 m review, horses of ChatgPT by 957 thousand. And 953.5k hints of embarrassment for the month of 2025.
Sidenote.
The brand radar is not only another LLM visibility monitor, we follow a immense number of queries in all these systems and you can ask for every product, service or brand and compare competitors. It’s more like a site explorer than to track ranks.
Here’s what the brand’s radar looks like.
Memory Share It measures how often the model chooses the domain.
Here is a comparison with AI assistants:
- Wikipedia All three dominate, but chatgpt (16.3%) cites it the most and then embarrassment (12.5%), followed by the AI review (8.4%).
- YouTube It is a clear favorite in embarrassment (16.1%) and AI reviews (9.5%), but he is missing upstairs in chatgpt.
- Reddit AND Quer High ranking only in AI reviews (7.4% and 3.6%). They do not pierce the top 10 in chatgpt or embarrassment. It seems that Google favors the websites of the content generated by the user.
- Information news Like Reuters, Apple News (AP) and AS.com are clearly in ChatgPT (4 – 2.6%), but they are secondary or absent in others. Chatgpt likes information sites.
- Health/Medical Sites (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic) register in artificial intelligence reviews, but they are not in the top ten for chatgpt or embarrassment. Embarrassment performs niche health places (Tasaude, Alodocter).
Here are the 10 best sites as mentioned in each AI assistant:
Not all quotes are equal. Some things are searched more than others.
I wanted to look at the visibility or meaning of various quotes. We have Google search volumes, but there is no reliable volume of searching for AI assistants. Weights quotes based on the historical popularity of search networks using Google Volumes.
Participation = Mentions the volume of searching keywords to estimate visibility.
Potential range = Memories weighted with Google search volume to estimate the potential exposure.
Here is a comparison with AI assistants:
Here are the 10 best websites according to the impression / potential range for each AI assistant:
