Peter Dutton announces that we welcome “overdose” in the rural ceremonies in the debate with a sizzling number of end leaders

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and opposition leader Peter Dutton conducted a debate of their fourth and last leaders about the campaign. The patch, run by 7News in Sydney, was moderated by the political editor 7 Mark Riley.

The costs of living and affordable in the clash, and both leaders recognize the pain pain felt by many Australians. Immigration, US President Donald Trump, Energy Policy and Welcome to national ceremonies have also been thrown out in many live exchanges.

How did every leader work? Did they do enough to convince undecided voters before the survey day? Three experts give their analysis

Andy Marx, Western Sydney University

These are the elections, Seven’s first row announced: “This will decide about the future of greeting in national ceremonies.”

The thoughtful voters undoubtedly accepted the promise of explanations. So Riley moved to the pursuit. Some people, as he said, are “uncomfortable” from the ceremony.

Dutton agreed:

I think that many Australians think that this is an exaggerated and inexpensive meaning of what they were to do. “

Albanese said that the organizers of the event should be decided or the ceremony. In the Lost Voice referendum? “He accepts the result.”

No fight. Simply, the consensus of both leaders on January 26 should remain as Australia’s Day.

The lack of a spark never stopped seven. The dramatic soundtrack spread for the statements of the leaders, added the atmosphere of Oscars, each of them gave the answers before it was recreated.

It worked. Halfway, the fire caught fire. “It’s challenging to believe in everything you say,” said Dutton to his opponent. “You made promises that you didn’t provide. People were broken.”

Albanese fired. “Piotr may attack me. But I will not let him attack the wages of working people.”

Wrpaants were released when Riley asked Albanese if he had Trump’s mobile phone number. “Do you have [UK Prime Minister] Keir Starmer? “Dutton added.

The nuclear power has driven the debate. “I’m proud,” said Dutton about the coalition Energy plans. But he would not commit to visit any of the proposed places in the last days of the campaign.

Suddenly she became a scientific lesson. Dutton asked “How will it work at night?” When you turn on the tap, Albanese replied, the water still comes out, even when it is not raining.

The most significant attraction? Dutton almost cited Taylor Swift. “The Prime Minister promises the Band-Aid option on the bullet wound,” he said at the expense of maintenance.

Blair Williams, Monash University

“This is a debate for every Australian,” said Voiceofer Channel 7 at the beginning of the debate. However, in order to refer to sex and the city Carrie BradshawI couldn’t not wonder if this debate would really embrace everyone.

We saw ordinary disputes between Albanese and Dutton in various crises, such as apartments and maintenance costs. Albanese argued that he would support through initiatives such as cheaper medicines and childcare.

However, he put his foot on scrapping a negative gearbox, because it is a measure that “does not build deliveries”.

Dutton’s answer explained that he was not planning to include “all” in this debate, because he quickly blamed the immigrants for the housing crisis in Australia.

Riley asked both leaders a question about Welcome to the country, saying that boiling during Anzac event caused a “significant discussion […] There are people in Australia who are not comfortable in the country. ”

Riley asked both leaders if the ceremonies were “exaggerated”.

Dutton argued that they took place, but he wants “everyone to be equal” as “we are all equal”. Dutton said he wanted the country to be “one”. This omits how structural defects, such as racism and sexism, cause inequality.

Albanese took Keating’s perspective more, citing the day of Anzac in Novel Zealand and the central place of the Maori language in their events, emphasizing the importance of people of the first nations and multiculturalism in Australia.

The debate ended without any discussion about violence against women. So far this year, 24 women They were killed as a result of sexual violence, with three in the last week. However, both sides barely mentioned this during the campaign or debates.

Women’s problems were also barely raised. While Albanese mentioned cheaper care for children, Dutton did not refer to any problems that may affect women. He did little in this campaign and during this debate to convince them.

Instead, both leaders wereted time to argue about the coalition plan for the production of nuclear energy in 2035.

“Does it support you decide?” Channel 7 asked viewers. For many women – and others – in the whole country he only showed two white men in suits and ties shouting over themselves. This can explain why a third of Australians will prefer a petite party or independent in the voting card. Perhaps they are voters who felt omitted.

Michelle Cull, Western Sydney University

While the debate began amiable, it warmed up very quickly. Dutton had difficulty completing conversation points in time, but he had no problem interrupting Albanese. The cost of living was crucial for the debate.

There were not many leaders they could agree to – no surprises. Although they both agreed, there should be no change until the date of the Australian day.

When asked about greeting in rural ceremonies, Dutton mentioned them at the “beginning of each meeting at work” and were “divided”. Perhaps there was some confusion here with the recognition of the country.

Dutton focused on a low -term relief of maintenance costs and its excise cuts. He blamed Albanese for high inflation, high interest rates and problems related to accessibility to apartments. The prime minister quickly reminded him that not everything was “Hunky Dory” when the Labor Party took office.

Albanese was well favored by many labor policy to reduce life costs through a lower Hecs-Assist, free TAFE and cheaper care for children. He was the only leader who included his party for tenants and social apartments, as well as the first buyers of the houses. Albanese also reacted to Dutton’s low -term relief using more eternal support from the Labor Party due to payroll increases and tax reduction.

Dutton was clever enough to quit the work party Proposed pension changes To the debate, referring to the plan of unrealized tax profits from the retirement balances of greater than $ 3 million. But it didn’t seem much further in the debate, because it did not refer to the question asked.

Now we will have to wait until Saturday to see if the leaders really managed to influence undecided voters.