In January, the Trump administration ordered a wide pause towards us all Financing foreign aid.
Among other things, this has a significant impact on US financing for HIV. The United States was the world’s largest donor of international HIV assistance, ensuring 73% of financing in 2023..
A enormous part of this is US President’s Emergency Plan to help AIDS (Pepfar), which supervises programs in low and medium income countries to prevent, diagnose and treat the virus. These programs were significantly disturbed.
What’s more, the last cuts of financing international HIV assistance go outside the USA. Five countries that provide the highest amount of foreign facilitate for HIV – USA, Great Britain, France, Germany and the Netherlands – announced cuts from 8% to 70% for international assistance in 2025 and 2026.
Together it can mean 24% reduction In international expenses on HIV, in addition to stopping foreign aid in the USA.
We wanted to know how these cuts can affect HIV infections and death in the coming years. IN New studyWe found that the worst scenario could see over 10 million additional infections than in the next five years we expected over the next five years and almost 3 million additional deaths.
What is HIV?
HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system. HIV can be sent After birth, during sexless sex or thorough contact with blood into the blood, such as common needles.
In the case of untreated HIV, he can go to AIDS (convoluted syndrome of immunodeficiency), a state in which the immune system is severely damaged and which can be fatal.
HIV was the most deadly infectious disease in the world In the early 1990s. There is still no cure for HIV, but state-of-the-art treatments allow you to suppress the virus with a daily pill. People with HIV who continue treatment can live without symptoms and do not risk infection of others.
Reduced global effort for consciousness, prevention, tests and treatment Annual new HIV infections by 39% (from 2.1 million in 2010 to 1.3 million in 2023) and annual deaths by 51% (from 1.3 to 630,000).
Most of this drop took place in Sub -Saharan Africa, where the epidemic was the worst. Today, almost two -thirds of people from HIV live Sub -Saharan AfricaAnd almost everyone lives in low and medium income countries.
Marybeth Semosky/Shutterstock
Our study
We wanted to estimate the impact of recent financing cuts from the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany and the Netherlands on HIV infections and death. To do this, we used ours Mathematical model for 26 countries with low and medium income. The model includes data on international HIV expenses, as well as data on HIV cases and deaths.
These 26 countries are represented by about half of all people living from HIV in low and medium income countries and half of international expenditure on HIV. We founded every domestic model in cooperation with the National HIV/AIDS Teams, so data sources reflected the best available local knowledge. Then we extrapolated our arrangements from 26 countries that we modeled to all low and medium income countries.
For each country, we first predicted the number of recent HIV infections and deaths that would take place if the expenditure on HIV remained the same.
Secondly, we modeled scenarios of expected cuts based on a 24% reduction in international HIV financing for each country.
Finally, we modeled scenarios for the possible immediate break of Pepfar in addition to other expected cuts.
With 24% cuts and Pepfar interruption, we estimated that between 2025 and 2030 there could be 4.43 to 10.75 million additional HIV infections. Most of them would be caused by treatment cuts. For children, there may be an additional 882 400 infections and 119,000 deaths.
In a more hopeful scenario in which Pepfar lasts, but 24% is still withdrawn from international HIV financing, we estimated that there may be from 70,000 to 1.73 million additional recent HIV infections and from 5000 to 61,000 additional deaths in 2025–2030. It would still be 50% higher than if the current expenses.
The wide range of our estimates reflects low and medium income countries, which at best in the worst case in the worst case in the worst case commit themselves to much largest national funds at HIV, or wider dysfunction of the healthcare system and a eternal gap in HIV treatment.
Some funds for HIV treatment can be saved by taking this money from HIV prevention efforts, but this would have different consequences.
The scope also reflects the limitations of available data and uncertainty in our analysis. But most of our assumptions were cautious, so these results probably underestimate the true impact of financing cuts on HIV programs around the world.
Sending progress back
If financing restrictions persist, the world may face higher annual indicators of recent HIV infections by 2030 (up to 3.4 million) than at the top of the global epidemic in 1995 (3.3 million).
Sub -Saharan Africa will definitely experience the greatest effects due to the high percentage of HIV treatment, which consisted of international financing.
We estimate in other regions sensitive groups Such as people who inject drugs, sexual workers, men who have sex with men and trans sex, different people can experience the growth of recent HIV infections, which are 1.3 to 6 times greater than the general population.

Will Oliver/EPA
Asia-Pacific was obtained USD 591 million In international HIV funds in 2023, which is the second highest after sub -Saharan Africa. So this region He would probably experience a significant boost in HIV as a result of expected financing cuts.
In particular more than 10% of new HIV infections It is estimated that among those born in Australia they were acquired abroad. More HIV in the region will probably mean more HIV in Australia.
But concern is the greatest in countries that are most affected by HIV and AIDS, many of which will be the most affected international financing cuts.