Many youthful people mistakenly think that it can be done safely, our study shows

Many youthful people mistakenly think that it can be done safely, our study shows

Around 50% of Australian young people During sex, they got involved in choke or suffocation. This practice includes one person exerting pressure on the neck of another, limiting breathing or blood flow (or both).

Straining during sex is associated with a variety of risk. They cover from effects such as bruising and vomiting to brain damage AND death.

Although occasional, suffocation is The main cause of death In harmony of BDSM.

There is no evidence that there is no sheltered way to suffocate. In particular, suffocation can cause injury Without leaving any traces and sometimes negative consequences do not develop just well After the dusty episode.

IN new studyWe found one of the reasons why suffocation during sex is so common, because many people mistakenly believe that although risky can be safely through moderation and adequate communication.

But stopping blood flow to the brain can bring less pressure than opening a non -alcoholic drink. And research shows that suffocation can even cause grave damage When it is consistent.

He examines youthful Australians

In 2023, we examined a representative sample of 4702 Australians aged 18 to 35 about their experiences and diet opinions during sex.

In 2024 we published test on the spread of sexual suffocation based on the results of this study. We found that 57% of participants stated that they were strangled during sex and 51% strangled the partner.

At the end of the survey, we asked the respondents:

What are your thoughts or observations about choke during sex?

For it New studyWe wanted to understand the perception of sexual suffocation. Over 1,500 participants commented on issues related to security in their answers and we analyzed them.

We surveyed youthful people in Australia about sexual suffocation.
Imyanis / Shutterstock

Many mistakenly believed that choking could be sheltered

It was for us that many respondents seemed to be sexual suffocation safely. Most often, participants perceived that it is sheltered when it is made with a low level of pressure exerted to the sides of the neck.

One participant, 31-year-old hetero, said:

My partner likes a robust hand on my throat, but it does not suffocate more from the trachea, but slightly limits blood flow when orgasm can develop.

24-year-old straightforward woman commented:

I think that there should be a conversation about how ponderous and what pressure.

Some respondents suggested that it is sheltered to hinder blood flow, not oxygen flow. However, limiting blood flow to the brain may also have Serious health consequences.

Although not all neck pressure will be fatal, studies show that even relatively low pressure can cause Death by suffocation.

In addition, if a person using suffocation or suffocation used alcohol and other drugs, the differences in pressure can be more tough to recognize, increasing the risk of suffocating a person.



Read more: Over half of Australian youthful people utilize suffocation during sex: recent studies


Communication and agreement

Participants also combined safety – whether emotional or physical – with consent to sexual suffocation. Like a 32-year-old straightforward woman wrote:

If I see no damage in the act between the two consequence adults who previously discussed it with the security plan, but I was undergoing failures in the previous sexual meeting, which made me irate and scared.

The 23-year-old bisexual woman said:

As long as both sides agree and pressure, it can be a pleasant experience. Consent should be agreed.

In general, consent was seen as a ongoing process in which it can be withdrawn at any time. 32-year-old hetero said:

It should be strictly based on consensus, be aware of the speech and breathing of your partner and ask if they want to continue their business or not if they do not refuse it and withdraw.

However, studies have shown that a strangled person may not be able to withdraw their consent with gestures or words, Despite.

Several participants commented on the restrictions of consent as a mechanism for reducing damage, considering that even where it was consistent, suffocation during sex can cause damage.

Two men talking at home.
Many participants discussed their consent in connection with sexual suffocation.
Lightfield Studios/Shutterstock

Disturbing, several respondents expressed concern that consent was often overlooked, intentionally or accidentally. A 35-year-old straightforward woman said:

The number of men who simply initiate him without asking a woman is terrifying and feel entitled to it.

Some respondents – usually women, but not always – identified the pressure to get involved in suffocation (both to a strangled one and strangling a partner). 24-year-old hetero said:

I’m afraid of this, but my partner makes me sometimes have the impression that I have to.

You need better education

Research from other countries such as United States They also showed a misunderstanding of potential threats related to sexual suffocation and a false belief that it can be sheltered if it is taken with “appropriate precautions”.

Previous studies showed youthful people they are commonly learned On sexual impulsion through internet pornography, social media and each other. Information from these sources is often misleading.

Although consent is a key part of any sexual activity, it does not make suffocation sheltered. Also, it is not about adjusting the pressure used.

It was positive to see how many respondents in our survey identified the desire for additional information about sexual suffocation. Detailed information about risk Related to sexual suffocation should be easily available both online and through public health campaigns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *